menu

KAT CALLS

Blimey, that time again already? It only seems like, ooooh, a couple of weeks since we last had the “weekly” Kat Calls round up. Well, if you read that last one, you’ll realise I’m trying my damnedest to catch up with my own tail due to various ‘difficulties’.

So it’s me again *jazzhands*, going on a bit about what I’ve been up to and how completely frazzled I bloody well am and how I keep fainting in the heat because of my stupid low blood pressure. So on to, well, let’s call it Friday to keep it neat….

FRIDAY

After slating A Chorus Line in these here pages, the publicity guy turned round and said, kindly, “Would you like some tickets to LET IT BE?” I thought, “You’re skating on thin ice, mate. I hated one, so you offer me tickets to something else you and me just know I’m gonna loathe, but hey, they’re free, so gimme.”

Savoy Hotel

Which was how I came to be seated in the SAVOY with son Sid. I had intended to have a poke around yer actual SAVOY HOTEL before the show, but for once we weren’t early and I didn’t have time. I’ve taken to poking around in hotels a lot these days as I’ve found their foyer sofas lovely and comfy and big to have a kip on when out and about in the smoke. I wondered if the SAVOY would actually let me and my scruffbag son in the front doors, but they’re not to know we’re not rich bastards who just hate dressing up. But it’ll have to wait till another day….

“I wondered if the SAVOY would actually let me and my scruffbag son in the front doors, but they’re not to know we’re not rich bastards who just hate dressing up”

LET IT BE is simply a pretend Beatles concert with actors who can also play and sing and who bear a slight resemblance to the Fab Four from a distance and if you’re not wearing your glasses. Sid likes the Beatles and knows Sergeant Pepper’s well enough, but even he was underwhelmed. It didn’t help that the volume was up a wee bit too much for these old ears. There was an unseemly fight over the earplugs and I won. Yay me!

In the end I gave up watching the band. The fact that George looked exactly like the new Barnaby from Midsomer Murders (Neil someone?) doing an impression of Basil Fawlty doing an impression of George Harrison unnerved me a bit – or was it my stupid mind, which always sees these convoluted ‘lookie-likies’, that had unnerved me? Well, let’s just say I was unsettled so settled on the audience to see if they were enjoying themselves.

The Brazilians down below us were! Four of them – two couples I presume – were giggling, squirming, drinking, talking, kissing, filming, getting up, sitting down, and dancing in the aisles. They were the only ones. Everyone else, like good theatre-goers, was sitting still, perhaps clapping or tapping their feet, and half tutting at and half admiring these carefree kiddies. The usher would ask them to sit down: they’d look bewildered, as if saying “this is a music concert you stupid British idiot”; they’d obey for five minutes; they’d get up and start gyrating again or go to the bar for more booze.

I was with the audience: half of me loved their attitude, half of me wanted to swat them like flies. As I wasn’t in any way bothered about seeing the concert, the first half won and I just stared at them and enjoyed their antics. One brilliant move that one of the boys perfected was holding his camera up to video the girl he was so obviously in lust with, and rather than asking her to turn around (it was too loud even for him), he did a swirling motion with his finger like he was stirring a blancmange. “Dance, my lover. Dance, my puppet. Later I will jump your bones,” that finger seemed to say.

 “”Dance, my lover. Dance, my puppet. Later I will jump your bones,” that finger seemed to say”

Me and Sid nudged each other, smiled, and copied the stirring motion. But then Sid went all meta on me and began videoing the bloke videoing the girl and I loved him just a little less.

Clapping. What’s that all about, excuse me? Clapping is strictly for the end of the first half (a smattering), and then the end of the show (full-blown). That’s it. Two clapping bouts and you’re done. Yet clapping diarrhoea is running rampant across this land. The first note of a song and someone claps – out of time. The first high note sung and someone claps – out of time. Always. And it’s always *cough* middle aged women who should know better. Tsk.

What enjoyment do people get to clapping along to a tune anyway? It a) makes it harder to hear the tune and b) it makes a right old racket. I may as well have stumps for hands when it comes to the subject of applause. I do my bit I suppose, in the right places (i.e. the end of the first half and the end of the show, AS I SAID), but I’m even a reluctant clapper then, as I sit there self-consciously thinking “I’m putting my hands together to make an arbitrary noise to show that I liked this show” and it all goes a bit wobbly in my head.

Never take me to a panto. I actually love, nay, adore a good old panto, but all that audience participation is like torture. “Put your hands in the air like you just don’t care!” Well, excuse me, but I do care and I don’t like to be ordered about by a man in a dress held together with clothes pegs thank you very much. I shall clap and wave my arms when I see fit, not before (so that’ll be never then).

That’s what I didn’t understand when I sat watching (mostly) middle aged women clapping like their lives depended on it. There was ‘dad clapping’ too, so it’s not the women I’m singling out totally. It just always seems to be some middle aged bint who’s had one gin too many who starts the whole thing off.

“It just always seems to be some middle aged bint who’s had one gin too many who starts the whole thing off”

And isn’t hearing clapping petering out one of the worst sounds in the universe, to the audience as well as the performer? It just sounds like everyone’s already lost interest in the thing they’re watching which sounds a lot ruder than if they’d just sat on their hands in the first place. Enough already.

To read my review of LET IT BE CLICK HERE:  http://gscene.com/let-it-be-the-savoy-theatre-review/

SATURDAY

A marathon day in London where I again had to catch up with my sleep in a foyer chair. I’ve now taken to carrying a blow-up travel pillow with me at all times which is handy, but does look a little odd. Blowing it up makes me feel self-conscious but by that time I’m usually too pooped to care much.

We started off having a sort of ‘behind the scenes’ look at WAR HORSE at the NEW LONDON THEATRE in Drury Lane. Sid and I had seen it when it was at the National years ago, but got some free tix through Twitter for this explanation of how Joey, the puppet horse, worked and I’d forgotten just how effective the horse was when he trotted on to the stage. Well, three men and a wicker frame.

Then it was off to Shoreditch to SUMMER RITES and we were actually on time while SUMMER RITES was late. Opening, that is. So we sat on a bench and when it did open we were just about the only ones in there as everyone was still off on the big march through town.

We’d gone on the march once, or rather, we’d gone in the crip bus on the march. Three hours cooped up on a stifling hot minibus wasn’t my idea of fun. As we passed, people seemed to think that because we were enclosed in a bus that we were famous and I got a lot of good stares and a few hopeful waves, but I wouldn’t want to repeat the experience. I’d never want to be famous. Your whole day must consist of catching people’s eyes as you walk past them and their faces either looking puzzled (‘Do I know you?’), excited (‘I do know you, don’t I!?’) or, worst of all, nonchalant (‘Yes, I know exactly who you are but I’d rather slit my throat than admit it, boyo’).

So there we were on a deserted common full of large tents blaring out loud music, with nowt happening. We couldn’t even console ourselves with food as there seemed to only be a couple of burger places in the whole joint. It was, to be frank, my idea of bloody hell. The earplugs came out. It was still unbearable. So we left, after all of 20 minutes. I’d like to say we just didn’t give it much of a chance, but it was more that it just wasn’t us. Not everyone likes music that makes your ears bleed.

But what to do until the opera in the evening? We ended up on a hot, sticky bus for an hour which made me think that that Pride march wasn’t looking so bad now. Off to our bolthole, the National, for a nice kip, and then to HOLLAND PARK for MADAMA BUTTERFLY.

We’ve been going to see OPERA HOLLAND PARK for quite a few years now as we get free tickets through their splendid Get Kids into Opera scheme. Unfortunately, it hasn’t succeeded in getting Sid into opera – he dreads going every year – but it got me into it and I’m nothing if not a big kid so I consider it a success.

Tis a posh affair – not quite as posh as Covent Garden, but posher than the Coliseum – full of people in evening dress with plummy accents paying a ridic amounts for champers. I like it though as we slum about amongst the crowd, eating our bread and cheese, swigging our squash. And the opera’s not bad either. Unfortunately, I got a German bloke next to me who played with his phone throughout. He was slowly reading his texts and then deleting them. When he wasn’t doing that he was looking at his watch. Then his wife, sitting next door, decided to join him in this little game. I sat and fumed, as you do, then let the low-paid door operative (or ‘usher’) do the dirty, awkward work of telling the Germans off. At that moment I fitted in with the opera crowd perfectly.

To read my review of MADAMA BUTTERFLY, CLICK HERE: 

SUNDAY

Sod all. The Land of Nod called.

MONDAY

I’m a sucker for a church, and one in COVENT GARDEN supposedly designed by Inigo Jones (they’re not quite sure) sure gets my juices going. Stick a Shakespeare play in and around it and I’m salivating like a pit bull that’s just seen a chihuahua wearing a bacon bonnet.

WEB.600.1

So it was with great joy and happiness that I dragged Sid to see Iris Theatre’s JULIUS CAESAR at ST PAUL’S COVENT GARDEN. St Paul’s is known as ‘the actors’ church’ and I’m pretty sure you’ll have passed by it’s back end at least once in your life, as its the bit of Covent Garden were all the buskers do their turn. There are steps going into the surrounding garden which are now a landscaped haven of peace in a madly touristy area. This, of course, used to be the graveyard, but now no one’s allowed to be buried there.

In 1839, in a book called GATHERINGS FROM GRAVEYARDS, a London surgeon wrote about the graveyard thus: “On a recent occasion, the grave digger had to make several trials before he could find room for a new tenant, and he assured me that on several occasions he had been driven from the attempt at digging a grave, and compelled to throw back the earth, owing to the dangerous effluvia he experienced from the soil.” Yuk! And what a great job!

I did once come across a gravedigger digging in a village church and asked him if he’d ever found any bones when digging and he looked at me as if I’d said something that had never crossed his mind before. “No!” Any coffin handles, or teeth? “No!” I left it at that as I think I’d actually managed to put the willies up someone who dug graves for a living. He was either spectacularly unimaginative or was lying and had found loads and loads of skulls and they were all lined up on his mantelpiece so he could play at being Hamlet every minute of every day (when he wasn’t grave digging of course).

My old pottery teacher had a human skull on her mantelpiece. Two of her pupils had brought it in to her one day, knowing she had odd tastes, claiming they’d found it on a bus. I’ve always thought that was a mighty fishy story, but have never been sure if the fishiness came from my pottery teacher or the two boys….

But I digress (again). Oh no, I can feel another one coming on…..

ST PAUL’S, being the actors church, pays host to many a memorial service for actors. I suppose they may have lived in and been buried in other parts of the country, so a service to remember them is most handy in the middle of London. Do you remember JAMES who I mentioned in my last missive? The autograph guy? Well, his autograph mates crash these services. They put on nice clothes and turn up and mingle with the congregation so they can sneak a signing or two out of them and enjoy the sandwiches and champers provided afterwards. Even I, a certified autistic idiot of the first order who’ll hang around most places for a vol-au-vent and a comfy seat, find this odd.

“Even I, a certified autistic idiot of the first order who’ll hang around most places for a vol-au-vent and a comfy seat, find this odd”

So, back to JULIUS CAESAR (at last). As we sat waiting for the play to begin, I bored Sid rigid with the history of the place so he switched his brain off. I couldn’t tempt him to edge his finger near the ‘on’ button even with the ‘effluvia’ story. What did wake him up was the bang bang bang of riot shields being bashed, as an army of masked men dressed in tattered leather and armour walked in.

So began a couple of the best hours of theatre I’ve seen in a long time. Atmospheric, powerful, and moving – and I don’t often say that about anything these days, having developed the dreaded Reviewer’s Jade. But I found temporary respite from it in that church on that evening as Iris took us on a walk round the gardens, playing a scene here, a scene there, ending up on the church steps and eventually into the smoke-filled church itself. There was enough blood to put a rosy glow into Robert Pattinson’s cheeks, most of it spilling on the chancel tiles. It was electrifying, and I will be snapping up a ticket to their ALICE IN WONDERLAND at the same venue which begins it’s run on July 30 (p.s. if you’re quick, you can still see Julius Caesar too).

“There was enough blood to put a rosy glow into Robert Pattinson’s cheeks, most of it spilling on the chancel tiles”

TUESDAY

BOEING BOEING at the DEVONSHIRE PARK THEATRE in Eastbourne wasn’t quite the trolley dolly style play I’d been expecting. I was thinking….ooooh…….sort of James Dreyfus in Gimme Gimme Gimme, but it turned out to be a 1960s French bedroom farce. I’d missed the film of the play totally. 1965 with Tony Curtis and Jerry Lewis in case you have too.

Boeing Boeing

One of the advantages of being a reviewer and not having to pay for tickets is that I can go into things blind. It’s the equivalent of sticking a pin in a map and stating “I’m going THERE!” with no idea where ‘there’ is or whether it’s a mosquito-infested swamp or a palm tree-lined paradise.

I try to not find out about a production beforehand as I like the element of surprise, and also, Google can come up with some really nasty spoilers if you’re not careful.

Anyway, I took my MUM to see this one which had Sid whooping with joy at his escape. He is an ungrateful sod really, as he gets to see so many things that he’s blasé now. Just wait till he grows up and I’m dead. He’ll look back and think me the most excellent mother who ever lived. Harumph.

The play was OK and Mum behaved OK so the evening was OK. Enough said really. Oh, and she bought me an ice cream in the interval. Result!!!

To read my review of Boeing Boeing, CLICK HERE: 

WEDNESDAY 

….was supposed to be a day of rest, but turned out to be a day of Mum again as I was offered tickets to see MERRILY WE ROLL ALONG which is on its last legs at the HAROLD PINTER in Panton Street (which sounds very like a musical hall song).

I couldn’t resist as this production had ‘received more five stars than any other musical in West End history.’ Well, I enjoyed it but five stars across the board? I could see Mum was miffed. I’d dragged her old crumbling bones up to London again with the promise of something spectacular and she got Sondheim (which I secretly knew wouldn’t be her cup of tea but I figured it’d give her enough to moan about for the rest of the week to keep her happy – and I was right).

THURSDAY 

PUDDING NIGHT!! Yay!! Even Sid had been looking forward to this one. It was a chilly walk on WORTHING PIER but I do like a pier. Not Brighton Pier. Oh no. I lived near there for too long for a visit to be considered a treat. It’s not the vulgarity that I can’t stomach: I love that. I love the Carry On feel to it and liked nothing better than popping in to the old Victoria Bar when I used to drink like a fish, whilst wearing a Kiss Me Quick hat and pretending to be CHARLES HAWTREY in Carry On At Your Convenience. No, it’s just that it’s in Brighton and therefore not exotic enough, whereas Worthing is all of 10 miles away! And Worthing smells of the sea (unlike Brighton which smells of people).

“……whilst wearing a Kiss Me Quick hat and pretending to be CHARLES HAWTREY in Carry On At Your Convenience”

We had a lovely PUDDING NIGHT, celebrating the 4th of July and all that and I put on half a stone which unfortunately my bracing pier walk didn’t make a dent in.

TO read read my review, CLICK HERE: 

FRIDAY

I’d missed out on MISS NIGHTINGALE when it came down to the south coast, but managed to catch up with it at the LEICESTER SQUARE THEATRE view: http://missnightingale.co.uk/

With just 20 people in the place I felt sorry for the cast. A bit hit and miss, it kept my attention and the queer love story between the Jewish refugee composer and the posh club owner was the highlight of the piece. Definitely worth catching if it comes around again.

The evening was spent with both my theatre and history lover hats on at the same time so it was a good job it wasn’t too hot.

I’m not sure how I’d missed a visit to the ROSE THEATRE site before, being both a history and a Shakespeare nut, but I was making up for it now by meeting the head honcho volunteer PEPE, a guy whose specialist Mastermind subject would never be in any doubt. I came away feeling that I’d just scratched the surface of what there is to learn about the site and a return visit is definitely on the agenda – probably with Sid in tow just to make him suffer.

My dad used to be a history of London nut and would go round places with me trailing behind him whining “Enough of the past already” (as I loved pretending I was Jewish when I was a child). Now he’s gone, I’ve caught him up and all that early grounding has paid off as now I can’t get enough of the subject myself. I work on the same principle with Sid. He hates me with a passion now for taking him to all these ‘boring’ places and ‘boring’ things but, as I said before, when I’m dead he’ll bloody thank me.

To read my review of Macbeth at the Rose, CLICK HERE:   

Next time, my lovelies, I shall drone on about going on a bear hunt with a Spice Girl (and Les Dennis), meeting Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, seeing The Lone Ranger before everyone else (with my earplugs in natch), and experiencing the log flume of circus boredom that is Timber! at Southbank.

How do I know this? Because once again I’m a bloody week behind in my ramblings and I’ve already done it all. Just gotta get it down on paper. Oh for a spare five minutes….

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DIRTY DANCING: Piccadilly Theatre, London: Review

Dirty DancingHow many people in Britain do you think haven’t seen the iconic 1980’s film Dirty Dancing? Just me? You’re probably right and it’s my USP for reviewing the revived theatre show that’s just opened at the Piccadilly. No preconceptions, you see. Before this evening I didn’t even know why you shouldn’t put a baby in the corner. Actually, it still doesn’t make a whole lot of sense….

After a successful six year run at the Aldwych, the production went on tour and is now back until at least February next year in its new home, the Piccadilly Theatre just off Shaftesbury Avenue.

Everyone (but me) knows the story, but here’s a very short reminder. It’s the summer of 1963. Francis (known as Baby, played by Jill Winternitz) and her mum, dad and little sis Lisa take their usual holiday in the Catskills on the American Plan, roughly equivalent to our Butlins. The resort is staffed by waiters and dancers just waiting to get into the girl’s voluminous 1960’s panties, and Baby makes the acquaintance of one of them, a sometime gigolo called Johnny Castle (Paul-Michael Jones).

Stuff happens. Baby and Johnny dance together, they fall in love, they’re kept apart, they reunite. Yay! A happy ending! Honestly, that’s as much of the plot as you’ll need to know if you’re approaching the story for the first time. It’s pretty self-explanatory and besides, everyone but me’s seen the film anyway, right? Right.

The first problem with the piece is the leads. Winternitz sports an authentic 80’s poodle-perm wig which looks so lank it makes you think Jedward had the right idea, while Jones just has hair that looks like a syrup. It has that odd Travolta vibe where it won’t quite sit still on his head one minute and then is as frozen as a dormouse cornered by a cat the next. They both have the charisma of wet fish, hers being a bit less moist than his. There’s not one iota of sizzle between them even in the key dance scenes which makes it a difficult watch.

Jones’ high-toned voice is all throat and no diaphragm, while Winternitz can out-bellow him any day with her deep, resonant tones. The pair are thus out of kilter just by opening their mouths. Both are curiously unsexual even when doing their best smutty moves, with the only truly smoking hot mama in the whole piece being Charlotte Gooch’s tortured Penny, who sways her hips and butt around and around like nuts in a very tight nutsack.

Dirty DancingThe second problem is the pacing. Scenes last for all of 30 seconds. The actors walk on stage, say a few lines and then they’re off again, giving the show a cartoon-like quality, as if written for people with a very short attention span.  If there was a great, galloping story to fit into two hours this might be understandable, but the plot could be summed up on the back of Nick Clegg’s ‘Promises I have kept’ list.

There’s also an almost complete lack of humour to the script (written by Eleanor Bergstein, the original scriptwriter of the film) with very few really cracking lines. The funniest turn comes from sis Lisa when she enters a talent competition with a nervy rendition of Hula Hana. This small spotlight piece gave her one of the biggest shouts of approval when the bows were taken and rightly so, but in a better show it would have just been another ‘funny bit’, not the stand-out it becomes here.

A revolving circle on the stage works well as it discretely ushers the lovers away behind the scenes when anything vaguely naughty looks like it’s going to happen. Otherwise, the stage is bare with a background of white wooden shuttering opening up to reveal a five piece band on the first floor level and an ever-changing projection of backgrounds below them, thus setting an atmosphere easily and quickly, but I think if I’d forked out West End prices for a ticket I’d feel a little cheated by such a sparse set-up.

The cleverest trick involves projections on a front-of-curtain screen of a forest, a field of grass, and the sea, all in quick succession: boom boom boom. Baby and Johnny dance behind them and seem to be ‘there’, immersed  in the scenery due to some simple but ingenious lighting. This gained laughs when they fell into the briny only to resurface a couple of seconds later with a big ‘pah’. The problem was that with the rest of the production being an irony-free zone, I wasn’t sure if the director (Sarah Tipple) had actually meant for this to be the comedic moment it was, or whether she just didn’t understand how daft it actually looked. When you’re that unconfident in the driver’s intentions, you’re already reaching for the car door and a speedy exit.

Considering Dirty Dancing is set in 1960’s America when everything was boiling over politically, every bit of ‘what’s happening in the outside world’ is shoehorned into one campfire scene – so American it made my gums hurt – with a This Land is Our Land and We Shall Overcome sing-a-long. Someone mentions the Cuban Missile Crisis, another says they’re going to join the Peace Corps, and then *fingersnap*, we’re back in the room and it’s never mentioned again.

This isn’t a musical, by the way. A musical, to my mind, involves the leads actually singing and neither Johnny nor Baby warble a note in this production. When singing is required, people are dragged up from the back of the stage to do the honours. Generally they do it well (Wayne Smith as Billy being a standout), but it’s not the same as having the two people we’re investing our emotions in singing their emotional hearts out. The music itself is an odd mishmash of styles, with all the classic 80’s hits thrown in plus some more modern, throwaway numbers. Nothing quite gels, nothing quite sparks, nothing quite works.

But hang on! What’s happening here? Johnny, previously a gigolo of good character, is accused of pinching things and is sent off from the resort with his tail between his legs. But tah dah! Suddenly there’s a huge crash (which both my son and I thought was a door falling off its hinges at the back of the auditorium) and he’s back, skipping through the audience, hair bouncing like a tortoise on a trampoline. “Nobody puts Baby in a corner,” he squeaks.

But Baby isn’t in a corner: she’s sitting at a table. Is this corner metaphorical or is she in an actual corner in the film, sitting with her back to us with a dunce hat on her cockapoo perm? Son Sid turned to me as the whole house erupted in hearty cheers of unalloyed joy, raised his eyebrows and shrugged. He’d given up trying to understand it too.

I was bored with this show; nothing more, nothing less. Having said that, my mate Cathy saw it twice on its original run and, well, the fact that she was willing to pay to sit through it twice tells you all you need to know, so it really is horses for courses. I think it goes like this: if you’ve seen the film and loved it, you’ll probably wet your expensive Piccadilly seat. If, like me, you’ve steered clear of it, it’s probably because the whole concept didn’t really take your fancy in the first place and you’ll want to tear your eyes out by the interval.

WHAT: Dirty Dancing,

WHERE: Piccadilly Theatre, London

WHEN: Until the world goes bang probably

TICKETS: £26.50 – £67

MORE INFO: CLICK HERE: https://seatplan.com/london/dirty-dancing/

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: What do you think, Baby?

STARS: 2

 

 

 

 

A SEASON IN THE CONGO: The Young Vic: Review

Photo: Johan Persson
Photo: Johan Persson

As we waited for the performance to start, I brought my young son up to speed with the ‘Scramble for Africa’ and the colonization of the Congo by King Leopold II of the Belgians.

“What happened next?” he asked, and I had to tell him that I didn’t know. ‘What happened next’ had happened in my lifetime but I’d only ever read up to H.M.Stanley’s opening up of the area in Africa that was arbitrarily bordered and named Congo. I faltered. “Well, that’s what we’re here to find out,” I said, shakily. And find out we did, in the most exciting way possible.

Aimé Césaire’s play was written just five years after the assassination (some say by the CIA) of Patrice Lumumba, the first elected prime minister of the Congo, and Césaire’s burning anger towards such recent events shines through.

It’s 1955 in Leopoldville, and Lumumba (Chiwetel Ejiofor) is selling beer (Polar Beer, “the beer of the unified Congo”).

Already we see conflict between the tribes in the area: one half swearing by one sort of beer; the other, another. The play sets its stall out early. This area now called Congo was never a unified country, it says. Even before the Belgians came, arbitrarily drew a border, and called it ‘their’ Congo, there was in-fighting between tribes. In a way, Césaire is saying that Lumumba as tribal peacemaker, as unifier, as saviour, was doomed to failure. It’s a startling way to begin a play: setting your hero up for a fall from the very off. But Césaire is dealing with real life. And fall Lumumba did.

But first he had to rise, and the first half of this irresistible play deals with his irresistible rise to power after Congolese independence was unexpectedly granted in 1960 and Lumumba was declared the country’s first prime minister in the first democratic elections held in this commodity-rich country.

Through a nightclub tableau, director Joe Wright (Atonement and Anna Karenina on film) shows us the changes in the country as it swiftly transforms from old/traditional to modern/sexy. This enables much dancing, singing and colour to flood the stage while half the audience look on from their makeshift tables and chairs positioned in a sunken semicircle between the actors (who sometimes drop down amongst them) and the normal seats.

The atmosphere is casual – happy, but charged. And sure enough violence erupts pretty soon and Lumumba is arrested and thrown in jail. It’s a rollercoaster of a ride from there, swooping through 1960 and into 1961 as the fastest decolonialization process in Africa begins and this kaleidoscopic ride is rendered in such a lively and immersive way by Wright that you feel part of the show yourself, even when (like we were) you’re sitting in the back row.

The narrative voice threaded through the piece is a native Congolese shamanic figure (Kabongo Tshisensa), an old man who plays the likembe and speaks prophesies in his native language that are then translated by whichever actor he’s nearest. A figure from Congo’s past intruding on Congo’s future and not liking what he sees one bit, he acts as the voice of continuity and sanity. He’s an interesting device but the pace of the piece is so fast that his profound-sounding utterances get lost as we’re given no time to digest them before another piece of fantastic theatre is thrown our way.

Filling the stage with joy, happiness, and later – in a red-drenched stuttering staccato dance – pain, choreographer and co-director Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui captures the complex nature of both the country and the story perfectly. Large puppet heads are used on the upper part of the set to represent the white colonial forces playing out their power games in doggerel verse (“God gave us Congo – it’s a sin to let it go”), while puppet vultures pick over bones on stage. White people are represented throughout with varying sizes of prosthetic white noses which gives an absurdist feel to the piece and which enhances the feeling of cruelty being ever-present.

Lumumba, an increasingly desperate, impassioned figure, is gradually undermined by both the colleagues he himself promoted, and the world powers who are only after the wealth of the country, and it becomes clear that however much he tries, he’s entered a fight he ultimately can’t win.

It’s difficult to express just how powerful Ejiofor’s towering performance is. In lesser hands Césaire’s wordy speeches would have been a touch dry for today’s audiences, but in Ejiofor’s hands they spark to life, catch fire and burn with an incandescent intensity. Lumumba’s prime ministerial acceptance speech (“Everything that is crooked will be straightened”), delivered just after he’s jumped down from the balcony via a fireman’s pole, is quite simply electrifying.

Photo: Johan Persson
Photo: Johan Persson

In a production as good as this it feels like nit-picking to point out the things that don’t quite feel right, but it’s got to be done. For a start, the puppet heads are less than convincing. Instead of being menacing, they bring a childlike quality to the piece, although the puppet vultures do chill the air. But when Wright does get the gimmicky aspects right, they’re genius. Hundreds of tiny parachutes literally bonk the audience on the head, while a small line of tiny figures pulled across the stage represent a line of pathetic refugees.

Another problem, inherent in Césaire’s script, is that we don’t get to see much of Lumumba the man, only Lumumba the politician. Yes, he has a wife, Pauline (Joan Iyiola), but even in his scenes with her, politics is pretty much the only thing they talk about. He’s a hero and we see very few weaknesses which can make his character feel a little one-dimensional. Again, a lesser actor would have had real problems here, but Ejiofor steers through dangerous seas with ease.

But these are very minor quibbles, and quibbles that can easily be overlooked in the grand scheme of this astonishing piece of theatre.

Well, my son is now up to speed on the Congo (as am I) and I’m pretty sure he’ll look back on seeing this production when he’s older and think ‘I was there’ as it’s destined to be one of those productions that’s remembered for years to come.

WHAT: A Season in the Congo

WHERE: The Young Vic, The Cut, Waterloo, London

WHEN: Until August 24, various times

TICKETS: http://www.youngvic.org/home

RUNNING TIME: about 2 hours 15 mins

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: In a heartbeat

STARS: 4 (simply because of the tiny flaws, and I’m being cruel)

 

 

 

 

 

Six Ducal Queers

A lIfe in Three Acts

Tomorrow night sees the start of six queer nights at the Duke of Yorks, both at it’s ‘Legs’ home and it’s ‘Komedia’ outreach post. Spread over the next two Pride weeks, the films are curated by Eyes Wide Open Cinema.

On Friday, July 19 at 10pm there’s a Divine double bill at the proper Dukes. I am Divine is a brand new documentary on the life of the legendary gal, plus there’s a chance to catch the evergreen Female Trouble. There’ll be live acts and music, so dust off those thigh-hugging boots and beehive bouffants and make yourself up to the nines.

On Sunday, July 21 at the Komedia starting at 1pm you can experience local icon Bette Bourne and acclaimed playwright Mark Ravenhill in one big dollop. Bette took on the establishment in the 70’s and 80’s with high heels and lipstick, playing a vital role in our liberation. The film will shed light on a hidden part of gay history: from the early meetings of the Gay Liberation Front, to the first mass gay protests in Europe. Ravenhill will be your guide, and both will be there in person after the film for a Q&A session.

Tomboy
Tomboy

The Life and Times of Harvey Milk is at Dukes at Komedia on July 25 at 6pm, while on July 26 there’s Tomboy (Komedia again), which plays to mark Brighton’s first Trans Pride. Tomboy is the tale of 10 year old Laure who presents herself as a boy, Mikhael, when her family move to a new area of France. A programme of short films will precede the main feature with the whole thing kicking off at 9pm.

6pm on August 1 at the Komedia sees a series of films from local filmmakers curated by Eyes Wide Open, where themes of sexuality, gender, separation, coming out and affirmation will be examined.

Rounding off the mini-fest will be THE gay icon herself, the one and only Judy Garland in her last ever film roll in I Could Go On Singing. Playing Jenny Bowman, Garland’s performance mirrors her own life and also stars another queer icon, Dirk Bogarde. It plays at 1.30pm at the Dukes on August 4.

WHAT: Six queer films and talks

WHERE: Duke of Yorks Picturehouse Cinema, London Road, Brighton and Dukes at Komedia, Gardner St, Brighton

WHEN: From July 19 to August 4

TICKETS,  CLICK HERE:

 

 

 

 

BITE-SIZE BREAKFAST: Stanmer Park & House: Review

BITE SIZE BREAKFASTS

Stanmer Park and House is a glorious destination on any day of the year but on a scorchingly hot Sunday morning with the Kite Festival just warming up and with breakfast and theatre on the menu it seemed an idyll.

The garden was already full of people topping up their tan at 10am and people letting their dogs cool off in the fountain as we wandered in to experience a BITE-SIZE BREAKFAST experience.

White Room Theatre’s BITE-SIZE BREAKFASTS have been making a name for themselves recently, winning awards both in Brighton and Edinburgh (the only places that matter of course!), and even getting their own slot on SkyArts, and I was here to see a preview show that’s about to be launched on the Scottish capital next month.

The ‘menu’ on offer consists of five or six short plays – from 5 to15 minutes long – by up and coming playwrights from this country and abroad, plus a light breakfast and all-round relaxed atmosphere. The plays are a mix of styles – comedy, monologue, two-handers, surreal, drama, parody – and are performed by a troupe of six actors.

A large platter of strawberries was proffered while we waited to be seated in the marquee, the true ‘bite-size breakfast’ of the title really, and a very healthy start to the day. This was followed by a cup of coffee and some Danish pastries, which rather cancelled out my strawberry health kick!

Settled in, host Sophie made us all feel welcome and fussed about us all having enough water as she didn’t want anyone dropping dead from the heat. Also offered was a free raffle ticket to win a pair of tickets to another of the Bite-Size shows.

The breakfasts alternate in content, as well as venue, and we were seeing Menu 3: Interpretations, although there are also ones called Two’s Company and, suitably, The Morning After. They’ve also just introduced a special kids menu called The Big Bite-Size Play Factory’s Family Creatures which they’re going to bring down south again after Edinburgh.

The short plays began with The Rehearsal, in which a bloke talks to his imaginary ex-girlfriend about just how great his life has become since leaving her (“I’ve been people-central lately”) until she turns up and he goes somewhat to pieces.

Using, perforce, a sparse set, the play worked in the intimate surrounds of the tent and it was a situation almost everyone had been in at one time or another so was a good choice to start the morning off.

The Interpreter told of a meeting between an American ambassador and a colonel from a tinpot republic, and how their female interpreter handled the tense situation. Badly, in a word. A swearing competition in their respective languages was pretty funny, and the pay-off good.

Up the Hilary Duff was the duffer of the lot. A monologue from a bleached blonde bimbo running an exercise class in how to have a baby and still look fab on the maternity ward was just too cringey. Channelling Sybil Fawlty, the actress struggled with her material and the laughs fell flat.

BITE SIZE BREAKFAST

Next on was the star piece, Transactions, a fabulously twisty turny tale of what’s real and what’s fantasy and how one can morph into another. It was played very well in a makeshift bed by two actors transacting some home truths. This short play was worth the admission price on its own (even if they’d taken away the pastries!)

It was a pity this didn’t end the show and that Waiting for Hashim did, a tale of middle class traveller one-upmanship that was a little bit ‘one note’. But it did end in a fierce bitch-scrap which everyone always adores.

Bite-Size is a strange concept if you think about it for more than a second – very short plays in the morning over coffee and cakes – but it obviously fills a hole. I’m guessing that at most festivals the breakfast slot is the quietest and therefore there’s less competition for people’s time, and Bite-Size also do corporate gigs which I’m sure are perfect for getting a room full of execs revved up.

For the price – £12/£10 – you can’t really go wrong here. Venue, food, drink and theatre: that’s an excellent package, and the surprise factor of not knowing quite what the plays are going to be about is tremendously enjoyable.

You can experience a Bite-Size Breakfast next down at the Latest Music Bar in Manchester Street, Brighton on July 20 and then again at Stanmer House (this time inside in the Henry Pelham Suite) on July 27, with doors to both opening at 10am.

 WHAT: Bite-Size Plays

WHERE: Latest Music Bar on July 20, Stanmer House on July 27

TICKETS: £12/£10

MORE INFO: http://www.bite-size.org.uk/

WOULD I SEE AGAIN: You bet!

STARS: Four

 

 

A Feast of Gilbert & Sullivan

Gilbert & Sullivan

A selection of your favourite Gilbert & Sullivan operas, performed by former singers with the D’Oyly Carte Opera Company, will hit the stage of the Congress Theatre in Eastbourne this Friday.

Accompanied by the British Philharmonic Concert Orchestra, with conductor Anthony Kraus, it will feature a fun selection from all of G&S’s works, such as The Mikado, Pirates of Penzance, Iolanthe and HMS Pinafore.

You’ll not only get the songs, but also some anecdotes of times spent in the D’Oyly Carte, plus some short dialogue scenes.

WHAT: A Feast of Gilbert & Sullivan

WHERE: Congress Theatre, Carlisle Road, Eastbourne

WHEN: Friday 19 July at 7.30pm

TICKETS: £24.50 with £2 off concs

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CLICK HERE:  

TIMBER! Queen Elizabeth Hall, Southbank Centre: Review

 

Timber

You could put forward a theory after watching Timber!, Southbank Centre’s newest circus act from Circus Alfonse, that its clunkiness, solidity, and general slowness is part of its authentic charm. It’s phooey of course, as the first and only real criteria a circus must fulfil is for it to entertain and in that, Timber! fails.

 

Timber! was put together in the French Canadian outback by a brother and sister as a 60th birthday present for their old dad Alain who’d spent his life as a wallpaper-hanger but had always had a hankering to be on the stage. He’d driven the siblings hundreds of miles each week to stage school and they’d both ended up in the circus and Timber! is their thank you to him.

 

The aesthetic is Quebec’s lumberjack and logging tradition, with the boys all sporting beards of various sizes and bushiness, the two girls in their checked shirts and dungarees, and the set consisting of wood, wood, and more wood. And when the action starts, guess what? More wood! Yes, you get the picture.

 

Old man Alain (now 66) wanders about the set like, well, like it’s his birthday (still), obviously loving the limelight and it’s difficult to begrudge him that, but it has to be said that he doesn’t contribute a whole lot to the proceedings. In one ‘ouch’ moment for all us oldies, he is suddenly hoisted from his chair and suspended bouncing on a wire above the stage. He’s then twanged back and forth, looking like a gnomic christmas bauble, in such a bone-jarring way that you fear for his spine.

 

The boys and girls meanwhile are busy throwing small hand axes at each other, slowly. They’re heavy little axes you see, which don’t exactly zip from one hand to another, giving the impression they’re being juggled underwater. It’s not exactly scintilating, but this is the warm up, right?

 

The folk songs that intersperse or mingle with the action are in French, as are Alain’s rantings and ravings when he goes into a small cabin at the side of the stage to have a poo, and the younger guys won’t stop stamping on the top of it (the kids and the French people in the audience particularly loved this bit). The language, unfortunately, is a barrier as it means we don’t get to know the characters on stage. The beards don’t help either as it’s difficult to distinguish who’s who when everyone looks like Steve Bell.

 

Thinking back, I’m having problems remembering the tricks they performed as, instead of the tension being racheted up and the acts becoming more and more dangerous, more and more thrilling, it stayed on a plateau of the humdrum. No trick seemed to have a beginning, a middle, or an end: they just floated along in a haze of woodsmoke and sweat.

 

A girl brought out a whip. Oooooh, I thought, this’ll be good, but she didn’t use it to do anything except crack it like a mistress ordering a recalcitrant bunch of bears to parade around a ring. It went nowhere, as did a clog dancing routine played out on the big solid table, and as did the log-sawing which saw two beards saw a log with a log saw while the rest of the troupe sat on the log to keep it steady. This was presumably to show that the saw was real as then one beard swung it around in  a circle while two beards jumped over it (jumped….ish. They more sort of skipped around the edges).

 

Sometimes the music became beautifully atmospheric, as when a haunting tune was played on some old wine bottles, or when the band produced a bevvy of jew’s harps, but the singing left a lot to be desired, most of it being so out of tune that I cringed both inwardly and outwardly.

 

The lights go down. A torch is shined upon Alain sitting in a rocking chair, smoking a pipe. He begins to tell us a tale, in English this time (pity I could only make out one in every five words). Circus Alfonse’s trump card is pulled. Little Arthur, the youngest member of the family at only 2, appears by his grandpappy’s big shadow head and dances and claps along to the story, a big beaming smile covering his tiny chops. ‘Aaaaah,’ went the audience. ‘Bleugh,’ went cynical old me.

 

This circus runs until the end of the month as part of Southbank Centre’s Festival of Neighbourhood with Circus Alfonse fitting in with this theme by dint of their being a family, and the ones who aren’t family being from the ‘village next door’ to the family. It’s a nice little tie-in, but Timber! has some hard circus shoes to follow as London audiences will still have the exciting Limbo and the very good Flown still in their minds. And Timber! is just that bit too creaky to compete.

 

What: Timber! by Circus Alfonse

 

Where: Queen Elizabeth Hall, Southbank Centre, London

 

When: Until July 31, various times

 

Tickets: £15-£32

 

For more information, CLICK HERE:

 

Running time: 90 minutes (no interval)

 

Would I see it again: No

 

Stars: Two

 

 

 

what happens to the hope at the end of the evening: Almeida Theatre: Review

WEB.600

“It’s 9pm and I’m waiting for my friend. I haven’t seen him in a long time.”

So begins Tim Crouch’s exploration of friendship, growing up and responsibility, in his new work that opened the Almeida Festival of experimental theatre last night.

And so it continues. It’s a constant refrain from Andy (Andy Smith), protagonist and narrator. “I’m waiting for my friend” punctuates this hour long piece even when his friend Tim has turned up with a bottle of wine and flowers. Sometimes it’s followed by “and I’m worried about him”, sometimes it isn’t. Are we in Waiting for Godot territory? Who bloody knows….

Here’s the deal. Crouch plays Tim, himself yet not himself, and Andy is played by Crouch’s friend Andy Smith, who is himself yet not himself. Confused? You will be….

Crouch wrote this play specifically to act with his old mate Andy, a theatre theorist who now lives in Oslo with his wife and kid (another is on the way and we were warned that if he didn’t appear tonight it was because he’d had to make a dash to be at the birth). Andy can’t act and it doesn’t matter. Mostly he sits in a chair with a script in front of him – after first taking his shoes off as it’s what they do in Norway – and alternates between talking to us, the audience, and ‘acting’ with Tim. He stares at us. He pauses. He pauses again. He pauses yet again. There’s an awful lot of pauses in this piece.

Crouch’s theatre has always been provocative, unusual, thought-provoking and, according to some, ridiculously pretentious. I’d never seen his work before, and I must admit that I was left slightly chilly by this piece. It didn’t help that there were obviously a lot of Crouch groupies in the audience who cracked up at the hint of a funny line and positively wet themselves when Andy asked us all to turn to the person next to us, shake hands and say ‘pleased to meet you’ (he’d just made a feeble joke about someone going to a church and mistaking ‘peace be with you’ for ‘pleased to meet you’ – cue rafter-high laughter).

So, to recap, we have Andy playing the Andy that Tim thinks Andy is, and Tim playing…himself? How Tim thinks Tim is? It does all get a little confusing, but once you’ve sort of grasped the characters and their relationships to the real people, it gets….well….even more confusing, but not in a wholly bad way.

The premise is that Tim hasn’t seen Andy for a few years and that they’re going to catch up. Andy is waiting for Tim. He’s waiting for him in real time and he’s waiting for him to grow up. Andy has the wife and child, he has a community he belongs to, he even has the self-possession to take his shoes off before he starts talking for fuck’s sake! He’s more or less a bloody grown up!!

Tim, on the other hand is, as he says himself, ’emotionally incontinent’ (“those are the words that are being slung around”). He gabbles, he has fits of harmless violence (he suddenly smashes the flowers he’s brought for Andy against the wall at the back of the stage), he mistrusts the little boys hanging around on the green outside who seem to be growing into a gang, he’s convinced the EDL are “planning a sort of Kristallnacht in the Chorley Road.” He’s a mess, but an active mess. “Fuck’s sake Andy,” is his mantra, like a nagging kid pulling at Andy’s trouser leg. He’s childish and needy – “Come and be with me” he pleads, as he sits on the sofa alone – “I am lost here. Move my arms and legs for me. You do it, you fucking do it!”

Andy, in comparison, is Zen-like. Inscrutable. Sitting on his chair with his script with a quiet smile on his face. In control. But he’s passive – not a mess, but passive.

How have these friends drifted so far apart? How do they come together again? Andy quotes a French philosopher who ‘suggests that love is a successful struggle against separation.’ And it’s clear that these two do love each other, do care for each other, and in the middle of the play they do come together and have a physical josh in the middle of the stage, involving water and tickling. Then they move apart. It’s a meeting in the middle of Tim’s frantic ‘doing’ and Andy’s equally frantic ‘thinking’. And I can’t think of a better way to show this than in a tickling bout.

Crouch also explores community in the piece, mostly through a series of quotes that Andy issues, but also by actions. Andy is grounded, centred in the two communities he lives in, and interested, through his work, in the dynamics of community theatre. Tim is mistrustful of everyone, is drifting, is lesser than Andy.

If fact, this piece seems more and more like a love letter from Crouch to his mate Andy. He’s saying to him “You’re a grown up now. You’ve made it. You’ve got somewhere. I’m nowhere.” It’s a paean to friendship and a piece loaded with self-loathing. Andy’s “I am waiting for my friend. I’m worried something has happened to him” makes sense as he is waiting for his friend to catch up with him in the evolutionary stakes, and he’s worried for him because he’s still way behind.

WHAT: what happens to hope at the end of the evening

WHERE: Almeida Theatre, Almeida Street, London

WHEN: Until 18 July, various days and times

TICKETS: £15/£10

FOR MORE INFORMATION: CLICK HERE:  www.almeida.co.uk/event/hope

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: no. or yes. or maybe. who knows?

Three stars

MACBETH: The Rose Theatre: Review

Macbeth

Sitting on a gantry watching Lady Macbeth lying in a pool of red silk, whilst a witch whistles across the black space below, I wonder just what’s down there. A compacted, dusty floor is my best bet, seeing as I’m on the archaeological site of Bankside’s first ever theatre, and only London’s fifth.

So when the Stygian gloom lifts I’m more than a little perplexed to find a black mirrored pool, with people scurrying about on the far shore like on a beach. In retrospect, the drip, drip, drip should have given it away but I simply assumed it was a sound effect.

It’s a startling theatrical space: damp, dark, cavernous and as steeped in history as any place could be. Shakespeare himself might well have trod the boards where I’m sitting, as a little way into the play a red rope light embedded in the floor is turned on and it’s clear that my feet, if not my body, are on the actual stage. I defy anyone to not be thrilled at that realisation – and what must the cast feel when they’re performing his words? It’s a closer Bardic experience for them than playing the Globe will ever be, seeing as the original of that theatre is not under the thatched roof down by the Thames, but nestled away under a Premier Inn round the corner.

I’ve come to see WHO Productions new take on Macbeth and it’s promising before anyone’s said a word. The atmosphere is set by sounds – whistling, a heartbeat drum, the aforementioned drip, drip, drip – so when the BBC News theme begins and a broadcast tells us of the corporate takeover of a large company (Crown Holdings – how apt) and Macbeth charges in dressed in a suit and with a mobile in his hand, the stillness is more than just shattered: it’s had a stick of dynamite stuck up its bum.

Things calm down a little and we get as much into the flow as we can with this odd production. Neither one thing nor another, WHO mash up styles like they’re going cheap in a sale. There’s a corporate vibe from Macbeth himself (Clive Moore), an African tribal one from the witches, and a spooky, ghostly one from Darkness (Lucien Campbell) who I don’t remember being in the play when I studied it at school!

Dressed in a black cape, the figure of Darkness pushes and pulls Macbeth, leans into him, lets himself be leaned into, envelops, crushes, and sometimes whispers. It’s a physical presence that just doesn’t work as his reason for being there isn’t clear enough. And that sums up the two big interlinked problems with this piece: the clarity issue, and the fact that it’s neither dance nor straight theatre. This second needn’t be a problem of course, but it is in this piece because of the first.

Moore, swigging whisky from his own private minibar, is good at showing Macbeth’s mercurial nature: one minute he’s all sound and fury, the next preternaturally calm, flummoxing his wife with his moods.

Francesca De Sica doubles up as Lady Macbeth and Banquo which, again, could work but doesn’t because of the lack of perspicuity in the dual roles. I can’t hear a lot of the dialogue from the witches as they all have heavy accents (Italian I presume, as WOH describes itself as having Italian roots) even though they’re so close to me, sometimes practically on my lap.

Being a very small playing space, the piece feels suitably claustrophobic, especially with its use of red curtains and cloth, but it opens out nicely by utilizing the space round the ‘lake’ where the actors are lit with torches or rudimentary lighting. I can’t see anyones face when they’re there, even though it’s no more than 20 meters away and that’s a bit disorientating when you try hard to catch what they’re saying as it bounces round the concrete walls.

This special venue could be such a fantastic backdrop for the right piece but alas, WOH’s Macbeth just isn’t that. But now I’ve been, I’m hooked on the place. They not only have performances, but talks about such things as bear baiting on Bankside, and they’re also on the brink of getting the funding to excavate a site that’s been left in a state of suspended animation for well over two decades, since it was discovered in 1989.

Bankside is a reclaimed marsh with a correspondingly high water table. The remains, once exposed to the air, began to deteriorate and so were covered over with water to preserve them – a bit like the Mary Rose I suppose. And hence the unexpected lake.

I stay around after the performance and talk to Pepe, one of the chief volunteers at The Rose (yep, it’s all run by volunteers, folks) who is obviously passionately in love with the place. I look at the illustrations on the walls which show what they think it would have looked like in Elizabethan (and briefly Jacobean – it was left to rot in 1603) times, and I fall in love with the place too.

Even if you don’t catch a show there, it’s well worth a look around. Thanks to the volunteers it’s open every Saturday from 10am to 5pm. Entry is free but a donation is gratefully grabbed and will go towards matching the funding they’re hoping to receive from the Heritage Lottery Fund.

What: Macbeth

Where: The Rose Theatre site, Park Street, London (about a 3 minute walk from the Globe)

When: Tues – Sat 7.30pm, Sunday 3pm only

Tickets: £12/£10

For more information: CLICK HERE:   http://www.rosetheatre.org.uk/

Would I go again: Yes, to the Rose, and yes to another of the performances they have lined up

Two stars

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE LADYKILLERS: The Vaudeville Theatre in London: Review

Lady Killers

It was always going to be difficult to reimagine one of the best loved British comedy films of all time, but Father Ted creator Graham Linehan made an excellent fist of it when his Ladykillers emerged for the first time on the London stage in 2011.

Now, two years later the revival, complete with brand new cast, satisfies the old comedy appetite admirably. Lineham’s trademark absurdity abounds, as do his killer one liners. The piece does have its niggling problems but nothing that will spoil the enjoyment of a laughter-filled night out at the theatre.

Mrs Wilberforce (Angela Thorne), a widow who lives alone in a large and rickety old house next to the railway line at King’s Cross, puts an advert up to take in lodgers. What seems to be the perfect hide-out for a gang of robbers intent on a large rail heist, turns out to be a more complicated set-up than they imagined.

Fooling the old lady into thinking they’re musicians, things start to go downhill straight after the heist when they start squabbling amongst themselves and when Mrs W discovers their real purpose.

The ingenious revolving set is really the star of this show, showing us the inside and outside of the house (with a surprise pulled off at the end), and split vertically into Mrs W’s downstairs domain and the boys’ upstairs room. Looking like it might fall to rubble at any minute so wonky are the angles and rickety the stairs, the house seems to have a personality of its own and its heights reach right up to the top of the Vaudeville stage as it peters out in a structure that reminds one of an elaborate birdcage. Pots and pans rattle and shake as the trains run past and the lights flicker on and off as Mrs W clonks the pipes forcefully for no good reason.

Undoubtedly it’s John Gordon Sinclair who has the biggest boots to fill – Alec Guinness’s no less – as head heistman, the wily and refined Professor Marcus, but once you’ve put aside comparisons his subtle and understated performance shines through and anchors the piece well.

The rest of the gang are a bit more patchy. Ralph Little as wide boy Harry is a chronic pill-popper with an OCD cleaning mania. Channelling Carry On’s Alf Ippititimus, he spasms and twitches his way through the first half and should either tone it down or ditch it completely as there’s enough nicely played physical humour from the ensemble and his hamming it up just distracts.

Louis, played by Con O’Neill, is a Romanian hard man in menacing pinstripes who hates “little oiled ladies”, while Chris McCalphy as the dim and dozy One-Round is the nearest in voice and presence to his filmic counterpart.

Simon Day (him off The Fast Show) is a revelation, bringing fantastic comedy timing to his cowardly Major Courtney. As the only character with more than one dimension (he has one and a half), Day sketches him well, especially when it comes to his penchant for a nice lilac dress. He’s the con man you find your heart reaching out to.

An unseen presence is Mrs W’s parrot General Gordon who sits in a cage at the side of the stage. We hear him, we see his tablecloth-covering move and we get fantastic descriptions of him (“It looked like a starving baby in a sock” and “He looks like a diseased washing up glove”) but see him we don’t.

We do, surprisingly, get to see the heist itself, albeit played out with toy trains and cars on the side of the house. An ingenious idea, it doesn’t quite work in practice being a bit on the clunky side but perhaps it’ll get slicker as the production continues.

The most glorious scene overlaps the interval and involves a gaggle of Mrs W’s old lady mates who’ve turned up to tea to hear the gang’s special recital. I say old ladies, but there are a couple of Pepperpots not-so-hidden amongst them, and I’m sure I heard half the audience mutter to ther other half “Is that David Walliams? It can’t be!” and it wasn’t, but one Pepperpot, sitting on stage with a gleeful smile and ear trumpet, was the Little Britain’s spit.

Mrs W’s posse sit ‘oohing’ and ‘aahing’ and bursting into sharp little glove-muffled bouts of clapping while listening to what Marcus describes as ‘an experimental piece’ (“Being fooled by art is one of the primary pleasures afforded the middle class,” deadpans Marcus, a remark which went down very well on press night).

After the interval, the serious business of killing begins when the gang turn on each other as they decide who’s going to do away with “the little oiled lady”. Some of this comedy violence works well, but some (impalement by bannister anyone?) seems to be there just to show they can do it.

As the death count grows, the darkness descends until the stage is in virtual blackout and we hear Marcus taunting Louis (the only two still alive) about his childish fears before dispatching him in a very nasty way. But even then Sinclair plays it for laughs, giving the audience a knowing look as he slips the body out of the window as if it’s as light as a feather (which, of course, it is, being a prop).

Although not quite matching the calibre of cast this play was afforded on its first London run, this revival makes for an enjoyable and smile-filled night out. In my eyes, Graham Linehan can do very little wrong (I loved Count Arthur the other night and if you didn’t then there’s something wrong with you!) and in tackling such an iconic British film and coming up smelling of roses, he proves once again that he’s a writer who can both invent and reinvent marvellously.

What: The Ladykillers

 

Where: Vaudeville Theatre, The Strand, London

When: various times, see website

Tickets: £20-£85

For more information: CLICK HERE:

Would I see it again?: YES

Four stars

 

 

X