As millions of people in the UK gear up for their summer holidays, GMB Union reveals airportsā “shameful trolley dolly culture”.
GMB Union represents tens of thousands of workers in the airline industry many of whom the Unions says are forced to work under “frankly dangerous” dress codes.
At international ground service giant Swissport, women are required to wear makeup and ālip gloss or lipstick in red, pink or brown is obligatory’; a minimum heel height of 1.5cm (that doesnāt apply to men’s uniform) and most controversially that ‘well groomed legs are a pre requisite’.
GMB membersĀ say they are only permitted to wear flat shoes at work if they provide a doctorās note – despite having to walk several miles a day in busy airports covering multiple terminals.
Dnata, the airport services provider for Emirates Airlines, has a uniform policy that is not only sexist but arguably racist too, saying dreadlocks are not permitted.
Shockingly, Dnata’s uniform policy on the issue of female body hair states that ānoticeable hair on legs, arms and face is not acceptable. Guidance says hair can be removed by various methods, choose which one is most appropriate for youā.
There is no similar requirement for male employees.
Dnataās policy sets out an extensive list of make up and make up colours which ‘you are required to wear at all times when in uniform’.
The rule is different for men, who arenāt permitted to wear makeup unless its ‘concealer to cover imperfections’.
Women ‘must wear nail varnish’ and when one nail breaks ‘they should all be filed down’.
Nadine Houghton, GMB National Officer, said: “I thought uniform policies like these had been consigned to the history books,Ā they have no place in the modern workplace. Itās shameful ātrolley dollyā culture.
“HavingĀ policies that apply to women but not men is discriminatory, plain and simple.
āRequiring women to wear heels and traipse about for miles on end, specificallyĀ not allowing them to wear flats like their male counterparts is downright discriminatory.Ā
“Equally worrying is forcing women to remove their body hair in order to be presentable – women have body hair, get over it.
āIt’s not for an employer to tell them they should remove it and nor should a woman be made to feel like she should have to in order to comply with out-dated and sexist standards.Ā
“If the āMe Tooā movement and the Harvey Weinstein scandal have taught us anything it’s that women need proper protection at work.Ā
āWhile these policies don’t constitute sexual harassment they contribute to a frankly dangerous perception of the way women ‘should’ look and behave in order to fit in with a superficial, patriarchal standard.
āIt’s these perceptions and dress code requirements Ā placed onĀ women that lead to them being sexually objectified.ā
You must be logged in to post a comment.