menu

REVIEW: Blood Brothers: Theatre Royal

zz7dae338a

Having seen it a number of times, I’m always impressed how Willy Russell’s musical is always a brilliantly captivating experience despite its potential drawbacks. Its songs aren’t exactly great – though Marilyn Monroe and Tell Me It’s Not True always hit the mark; its plot is slightly contrived and very manipulative; it seems to have remained unchanged in its staging for decades (an evil part of me wants them to bring in a radical director who will give it an all female cast and set it during the last years of the Weimar Republic). But despite all this its finale brings a tear to the eye every damn time.

Set in Liverpool in the ’70s, the it tells the story of Mrs Johnstone (Lyn Paul) a poor Catholic woman who has seven kids and another on the way. Except this new one, according to her gynaecologist, is actually twins.

She had budgeted to just about scrape by when the new baby arrives, but her scrimping won’t extend to feeding two mouths. She has a job cleaning house of local posho Mrs Lyons (Sarah Jane Buckley) who can’t have kids herself and can’t adopt as her husband is dead set against raising a child who doesn’t share his DNA. So Mrs Johnstone has one too many kids, Mrs Lyons one too few and, fortuitously, her husband is out of the country for nine months…

Lyons persuades Mrs Johnstone to hand over one of her children. The action then moves on seven years and Mickey (Josh Capper), the son who stayed with his natural mother, becomes best friends with neighbourhood toff Eddie (Mark Hutchinson).

They innocently play together, pronouncing themselves blood brothers, little realising how apt that term is. But as they grown older their lives diverge on different tracks determined by class until they both fall in love with the same childhood sweetheart Linda (Alison Crawford).

Paul gives a truly committed performance carefully balancing her character’s toughness and vulnerability. When she tells Mrs Lyons to choose one of her children but ‘just don’t tell me which one’, the despair in her voice is heartbreaking. Capper fully realises the descent of a likeable young man brought down due to prison, pills, unemployment and the seemingly malign hand of fate. Dean Chisnall’s narrator – perhaps the visible manifestation of this fate – has the requisite amount of steely non-attachment; when he occasionally hints at some sympathy it therefore becomes more affecting.

Blood Brothers is more than a conventional weepie though. Underlying it all is an anger at the the iniquities of the class system. Its political analysis is not exactly subtle – nothing about the show is subtle – but if you understand that subtlety is not necessarily a virtue you’ll be won over by this big-hearted, tough-minded, hugely entertaining evening.

Continues at the Theatre Royal, Brighton until December 3.

For more information and tickets click here.

REVIEW: The Boys in the Band: Theatre Royal

 

zz2a795a52

Political criticism has dogged Mart Crowley’s 1969 play from the start. Its portrayal of a group of bitchy, self-hating queens has never been on-message as far as the gay rights movement is concerned. It’s the perennial problem with gays – or any minority – that their portrayal could be seen as presenting some kind of truth about the group as a whole. An unfair disadvantage considering no one has ever left Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf thinking white American straights are completely barking mad.

The characters may not always be that likeable – at various times they are spiteful, shallow and racist – but the talented cast always highlights their vulnerability. However badly they treat each other, and themselves, they are quite clearly battling their own demons.

The action takes place during the night of a birthday party thrown for ‘ugly pockmarked Jew fairy’ Harold (Mark Gatiss) by his friend Michael (Ian Hallard) – a queer who externalises his Catholic guilt by being as vituperative to his friends as he can get away with – and occasionally going a bit further than that. Those taking part in the celebration include ageing ‘pansy’ Emory (James Holmes), African-American Bernard (Greg Lockett), dumb-but-pretty escort played by Jack Derges and Michael’s straight friend from college Alan (John Hopkins).

During the course of the evening they turn on each other for their perceived inadequacies: for being too conventional or too gay or too pretty or too ugly. Some of the themes feel a bit dated – the idea that a married man who despises queers might himself turn out to be gay was probably more shocking forty years ago. And whilst racism is touched on, it’s dealt with a bit too tritely with the black character simply saying it’s OK when he does it, but not so much coming from someone who’s white.

Holmes comes close to stealing the show with his wonderfully gravelly yet camp New York drawl. Gatiss is marvellously acidic; and something of a commanding presence as he battles his nemesis cum friend. Hallard, although playing the most frankly poisonous of the group, manages to find some sympathy for a man emotionally constrained by his own self-loathing.

Taken as a whole Boys is a very entertaining mix of comedy, melodrama, and exceedingly bitchy put downs. The most sympathetic character Donald (Daniel Boys) becomes the person the audience identifies with the most – it’s made clear he’s an outsider of this group – and the image of him holding his cruel, damaged friend during the play’s last few minutes is a quietly poignant contrast to the occasional campy histrionics of the preceding two hours.

Continues at the Theatre Royal, Brighton until November 12.

For more details and tickets click here.

REVIEW: Alan Cumming Sings Sappy Songs: The Dome

zz66ae2b19

Early on in the show Cumming invites us to ‘open your heart and take off your judgey hat’ – complete anathema to a critic – yet by the close my heart was indeed filled with no small measure of love for my fellow man, and my ‘judgey hat’ (a fur-lined fedora if you must know) had been tossed recklessly to the floor. This is a spectacularly entertaining evening of cabaret and confessional sprinkled liberally with some showbiz anecdotes.

Cumming himself is a very engaging performer, he not only has he the voice but, perhaps just as importantly for this kind of show, he’s so obviously a good guy – there’s nothing precious or diva-ish about him – that the audience warms to him from practically his first word. I’m still not sure what was going on with his costume – a vest with a collar (not sure if there’s a name for such a garment), a tie and a really horrible pair of elasticated leatherette pantaloons.  A dare? A provocation? A cry for help? Sadly there was no Q and A for anyone to find out.

The songs cover quite a range, from Miley Cyrus to Stephen Sondheim to Rufus Wainwright. One of the highlights is Last Day on Earth written by his relatively less-famous musical director and pianist Lance Horne. Cumming has the gift of making each song totally his own, so much so that quite often it’s hard to  place the song so completely does he reinvent it. The opening song – Annie Lennox‘s Why – ends with Cumming delivering the lyrics almost as a kind of sermon delivered by a fire and brimstone preacher. He stretches the definition of ‘sappy‘ with a powerful take on the Weill-Brecht song What Keeps Mankind Alive – a searing indictment of greed, hypocrisy and metaphorical cannibalism – which has to be the least sappy song ever written.

Cumming talks movingly about his relationship with his abusive father, and how when making an episode of Who Do You Think You Are for the BBC he discovered some disturbing truths about his grandfather. He gets right the balance between the heart-on-sleeve emotionalism with adventures in Hollywood such as writing and starring in a condom commercial with Ricki Lake.

He’s joined for a couple of songs by the Brighton Gay Men’s Chorus for a mashup of Firework/Someone Like You/Edge of Glory and then Cumming’s first performance of Last Day On Earth, written by his musical director, Lance Horne. Due to technical problems with the sound both me and my companion for the evening found them to be all but inaudible.

Despite Cumming having discussed the ludicrous ritual of the encore we duly clap with the requisite desperation the second he leaves the stage. We’re rewarded with a brilliant take on Sondheim’s Ladies Who Lunch, normally a lightly acidic confection but here delivered with more than a hint of madness, of something spiralling out of control.

The Brighton Gay Men’s Chorus will  be joining Cumming once again this evening for his show at the London Palladium.

REVIEW: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street at 88 London Road

zz09a6eaa7

This is a spirited version of Stephen Sondheim’s musical of murder, revenge and madness. It has some very good performances, it’s well paced, finely costumed and designed, and, apart from problems with the acoustics – words are often drowned out by the band which is a shame as Sondheim is such a superb lyricist – there’s little to complain about. However, for me the production never quite reaches the heights it should. I have to point out here that I love Tim Burton’s film adaptation and, perhaps wrongly, couldn’t help comparing each performance and song with the way it was presented in the movie – with the movie scoring more wins than losses.

Hugh Wheeler’s book takes the barnstorming melodrama and fleshes out the protagonists. It also has a distinctly political edge to it showing how those with money and power exploit the lower classes in a society where ‘those below serve those up above’. Although this is a penny dreadful come to life, it has a depth which belies is sensationalist origins.

Callum McArdle certainly has the brooding, saturnine air of a man who has been the victim of men’s cruelty and decides to repay humanity back in spades. His descent from wounded victim into depravity is absolutely convincing. He has a fine voice, a commanding presence, and is an excellent Todd. Alice Redmond is wonderful as Mrs Lovett, Todd’s venal partner in crime. She manages the not inconsiderable feat of making the audience feel some sympathy for her unrequited love of Todd despite the fact that it’s at her suggestion many innocent Londoners end up as filling for her meat pies. Alistair Higgins gives one of the stand-out performances as Tobias Ragg, the urchin who unwittingly ends working up in the human pie business. His rendition of Pirelli’s Miracle Elixir is a mischievous highlight; and his final descent into madness is unnervingly impressive.

This is an enjoyable evening of gothic horror which is a fine introduction to one of Sondheim’s masterpieces. My companion for the evening, who hadn’t seen it before, enjoyed it thoroughly. So if you’re new to it – or have the strength of will I lack and can resist comparing it to the film – I’d warmly recommend it.

Continues until October 29.

For tickets and more information click here.

web-600-3 web-600-6

REVIEW: Relatively Speaking: Theatre Royal

Alan Ayckbourn’s 1967 play takes a deceptively simple idea, stretches to what seems like breaking point, and then incredibly takes it further.

ZZ0C5A8A55

It’s basically four characters and one misunderstanding; but the writing is so sharp, and the central misunderstanding’s offshoots so brilliantly cultivated, that the play is one of the funniest I’ve seen.

Greg (Antony Eden) is intent on marrying girlfriend Ginny (Lindsay Campbell) but he fears she may be keeping something from him. The big clues that there may be another man include mystery bouquets of flowers, wrong numbers, and a pair of slippers two sizes too big for him under the bed. When he finds a cigarette packet with an address written on it Ginny claims it’s where her parents live, and she’s going to visit them over the weekend. In a grand romantic gesture Greg decides to go down to their country house and ask Philip (Robert Powell) and Sheila (Liza Goddard) for Ginny’s hand in marriage. Unfortunately, Philip and Sheila aren’t Ginny’s parents.

As the play unfolds it’s like some incredible high-wire act: it can only work by characters not asking certain questions and giving a fair number of ambiguous answers to the questions that are asked. Yet despite the sheer impossibility of what we’re seeing, it never feels forced and the audience never feels that Ayckbourn is cheating. Slowly some characters realise what is happening and then quickly have to alter their behaviour as they work out how best they can further their own ends.

All the performances are spot-on. Powell achieves a certain magnificence when he has to in effect answer the same question differently to three people at the same time. His confused ‘Yes! No! Yes!’ perfectly shows his confusion, despair and a certain bewilderment that’s he’s in the mess he’s in.

It’s probably worth mentioning that Relatively Speaking is based almost entirely around themes of infidelity and mistrust. However, it’s not as jaundiced as Ayckbourn’s later work though perhaps this is because, at some level, it doesn’t feel quite real. So much so that when one of the characters attempts to blackmail another into resuming an affair it seems an acceptable plot machination rather than something sinister and unpleasant.

The publicity shot on the theatre’s website showing Powell and Goddard chuckling in the direction of a newspaper as they eat breakfast made me very wary with its vague atmosphere of a mediocre ’70s sitcom. Don’t let it put you off as this really is a magnificent comedy.

Continues at the Theatre Royal, Brighton until Saturday 10.

For more details and tickets click here.

REVIEW: Brighton Festival: Stella

ZZ657EE2CE

Neil Bartlett’s two-hander (technically a three-hander) is a complex meditation on gender and identity. It’s based on the life of Victorian cross-dresser Stella (born Ernest) Boulton who survived a scandalous court case and went on to have a successful career as a female impersonator.

Bartlett’s text for the piece is very dense with allusions, ruminations and symbolism on the theme of gender and performance. So much so that I think a very interesting biography gets somewhat lost. From the play I got a vague impression of a few drag shows and a bit of prostitution, but Bartlett’s interview in the Latest shows that Stella’s career was more, well, stellar. I certainly wish I’d read it before seeing the show as then knowing the main facts of the case I could just enjoy the brilliantly realised character of Stella herself.

The heroine of the piece is presented by two performers: Oscar Batterham is Stella at twenty-one, and Richard Cant is Stella living in straitened circumstances, dying of cancer and waiting for a taxi to take her to hospital – a journey from which she knows she will not return. Both actors share both a physicality and emotional core which makes the audience see them both as the same person. Batterham, the beautiful youth, is flirty but also fiercely angry at the many injustices she suffers at the hands of lovers, the police and large portions of society.

Cant gives one of the most remarkable performances I’ve ever seen. He gives the fullest possible representation of a living, breathing Victorian; without being showy or ‘acting’, everything he says, every gesture goes towards summoning up this vastly complex character. Dressed in male clothes – as Bartlett explains it was the only way Stella could get hospital treatment – Cant is by turns fragile, imperious, angry, dignified and perhaps a little mad. Or maybe it’s the opiates Stella is taking for the pain. There are parts of the evening that are truly heartbreaking. When he talks about a lover having possessed “the last hands ever to touch me” it’s presented so matter of factly that it becomes more devastating than any show of maudlin sentimentality.

The third character is referred to in the programme as The Attendant (David Carr). He is a shaven-headed black man wearing a modern suit who observes the two Stellas as they speak. Who, or what, he represents is beyond the powers of my intellect to fathom.

I’d recommend Stella to everyone. It’s intelligent, literate, it’s also funny – I hope I’ve not portrayed it as some kind of Gender Studies lecture as it certainly isn’t. But it really has to be seen for its spellbinding central performance.

Continues at Hoxton Hall from Jun 1 –Jun 18.

For interview with Neil Bartlett, click here.

For more details and tickets, click here.

REVIEW: Brighton Fringe: Briefs

ZZ1639F5E8

I saw Briefs last time it was in Brighton a few years ago and loved it. It was fun and warm-hearted and featured some incredibly handsome men in pants. On the whole it’s very entertaining, but on second acquaintance a few cracks are starting to show.

Shivanna has a great presence as the Mistress of Ceremonies, but a lot of her material hasn’t changed. Which would be fine if the routine was perhaps a bit sharper. Of course this is pure personal preference but I tend to switch off when someone is doing acrobatics involving a hula hoop. Unless it’s on fire in which case I’m awestruck.

But the good stuff easily makes up for any longueurs. Evil Monkey Man is still a reliably rampant id, violating bananas and audience members with maniacal glee.

The Naughty Schoolboy routine – it’s not quite as sinister as it sounds – perfectly balances innocence and eroticism which is surely the very heart of burlesque. Or, as I think we have to call it, boylesque. The Dog Sketch – it has a denouement more shocking than even The Sixth Sense – reliably produces shrieks from anyone who doesn’t know its awful twist.

There’s some astounding displays of skill. Monkey Man’s act where he does a routine with an incendiary hula hoop is really impressive – he seems to be constantly millimetres away from some pretty serious singeing. Though having another act with a non-flaming hoop appear later in the show results in an inevitable feeling of anticlimax.

This time round my impression was of a brilliant hour trapped in a ninety-minute show. Though if you haven’t seen it before you’ll almost certainly have a blast.

Continues at Republic, Madeira Drive until June 3.

For more information and tickets click here.

REVIEW: Dealer’s Choice@88 London Road

ZZ3DD1A627

Patrick Marber’s play is a jaundiced look at masculinity and shows how men fail at being fathers, sons and friends. During one night of poker the game itself becomes a kind of weapon which the play’s characters use to goad, taunt and humiliate each other. But the portraits presented, though far from flattering, have a good deal of subtlety and depth: occasionally one of the six anti-heroes will wrong-foot the audience by some small display of sympathy or even kindness.

Carl (Griffin Stevens) has an uneasy relationship with his restaurateur father Stephen (Neil Roberts) who taught him poker but now sees his son as an abject failure with a gambling problem. Sweeney (Ben Crowe), Frankie (Samuel Clemens) and Mugsy (Matthew Zilch) all work for Stephen and the already fraught employer-employee relationship is complicated by their weekly all-night poker evenings. The arrival of a sullen, almost menacing, customer Ash (David Keyes) leads to revelations which could see father and son pushed even further apart.

Though it might not sound it from the above description, Dealer’s Choice is a comedy. It might be harsh, and even unpleasant, but it is very funny. Naturally, in this testosterone-charged environment the go-to choice of insult is the one that emasculates. Typically this is done by caustic observations delivered in a lisping voice or referring to each other as a ‘girl’ or ‘little madam’ – and there is the traditional act of simulated buggery without which no critique of masculinity is complete.

The play boasts some truly excellent performances. Zilch is great as the almost-lovable dimwit who, despite the company he keeps, seems to maintain an almost childlike innocence. Roberts has a louche charm, and his portrayal seems balanced on a knife-edge between the paternal and the reptilian. Crowe is excellent as the Everyman – or perhaps Everygeezer – who would be a very good father if, after finally winning access to his daughter, he didn’t gamble away the money he needed to take her on a day out.

Continues until April 16 at 88 London Road.

For more details and tickets click here.

REVIEW: King Charles III: Theatre Royal, Brighton

ZZ4DAEFB16

Queen Elizabeth is dead and immediately the rest of the Royal Family are arguing about the workings of the constitution: does Charles (Robert Powell) ascend the throne immediately, or does he only become king upon his coronation? This minor problem of regal procedure soon becomes irrelevant when the King decides to upturn a centuries-old tradition by refusing to sign a bill he doesn’t agree with. And soon there’s a tank parked outside Buckingham Palace and there are vague threats of civil war.

Mike Bartlett’s play is vastly entertaining look at royalty, the machinations of the political establishment and the identity of England itself. It’s also written in blank verse and the dialogue, and some of the plotting, is self-consciously Shakespearean. It even boasts a ghostly visitation bearing a prophecy. It takes a while to adjust to modern characters brandishing the occasion ‘doth’ but, strangely, this conceit works perfectly. It strikes me almost as if Bartlett has, in part, produced a conceptual work of art, rather like a Koons sculpture which is the perfect simulacrum of a blow-up plastic toy but is actually made of cast metal.

Rather than go for mere imitation, Powell gives a brilliant portrait of a man who decides to act on principle. Whereas the real Charles is, in the popular imagination at least, something of a well meaning meddler, Powell invests him with something approaching grandeur. It’s also an entirely sympathetic portrayal which may wrong foot any republicans expecting something more obviously critical or even mocking. When his Prime Minister (Tim Treloar) tries to bring the memory of the King’s former wife to bear for his own political ends, there’s a real moment of pain as he chastises the man for trying to ‘utilise Diana’ so early on in their relationship.

Penelope Beaumont’s Camilla is as strong and determined as Kate Middleton (Jennifer Bryden), and Ben Righton is suitably determined as William, the prince who will end up betraying his father. As is fitting for the soap opera the Royal Family is, Harry (Richard Glaves) gets his own storyline in which he falls in love with a commoner (Lucy Phelps) and decides to give up any claim to the throne – and the cash from the civil list – to be with her.

The production itself is flawless. The stark but beautiful set conveys something of the coldness and tradition of the family under scrutiny; and the music by Jocelyn Pook has a solemnity which amplifies the sense of history being made.

Continues at the Theatre Royal, Brighton until Saturday 13.

For more information click here.

REVIEW: Private Lives: Theatre Royal, Brighton

'

Noël Coward’s play is a gossamer thin confection about love and life amongst the beautiful and fabulously wealthy. Tom Attenborough’s production somehow manages to make heavy work of one of the lightest pieces in the theatrical canon. Despite some fine performances, lines that should sparkle like the finest martini glass never quite seem to fulfil their potential.

Eliot Chase (Tom Chambers) is a rich gentlemen of leisure – none of the characters ever mention employment of any type – on honeymoon with Sibyl (Charlotte Ritchie). By a rather unfortunate coincidence in the next hotel room along his former wife Amanda (Laura Rogers) is on her honeymoon with the slightly pompous Victor Prynne (Richard Teverson). After five years since their marriage broke up the divorced couple finds that, despite the fact they were poison to each other, there’s still some force of irresistible attraction.

Rogers plays the part well, she’s certainly vivacious and can deliver a put down with a withering froideur. Chambers fares less well; he’s not bad but doesn’t quite have the charm, the theatrical heft which even a role this superficial still requires to make the play work. Teverson is good as the ‘rampaging gasbag’, as is Ritchie who goes from sweetly vulnerable to ferociously angry over the course of three acts.

The play itself has some problems. It’s been a few decades since an audience could safely laugh at a man hitting a woman (even if she first breaks some gramophone records over his head first). The aggression Chase shows his wife – jokily threatening to put a meat cleaver in her head because she won’t fall in with his unreasonable requests – leaves a bit of a bad taste. And the play’s sheer inconsequentiality can become slightly irritating.

It’s hard to pinpoint exactly why this production doesn’t work. Perhaps some speed in the playing, a slightly more charismatic lead, and a set which is at least 75% more opulent might have helped.

Continues until February 6.

For more info click here.

X