menu

OPINION: The Ramblings of a Not-So-Trendy Teen 

You must be white, cis, straight-acting and ripped or you’re not gay says Lee Henriques.

THOSE are the expectations set upon men in the LGBT+ communities, aren’t they? Our standards of beauty consist solely of whiteness, cisness and stereotypical (AKA toxic and heteronormative) masculinity.

Let’s take the new Queer Eye – a wonderfully campy show starring five fabulous gay men; who does everybody look to as the ‘hunk’? Antoni. Jonathan’s too femme, Karamo and Tan aren’t white, and Bobby’s not ripped. Now, this isn’t to fault men who are white, cis, thin and not particularly feminine (I know I’ve immediately hurt a few fragile egos here, and this isn’t a personal attack on Antoni) but they certainly shouldn’t be held to the extremely high calibre that they are.

The term ‘straight thin, but gay fat’ feeds into the vicious standardised beauty cycle that perpetuates the horrid body dysmorphia and eating disorders among LGBT+ men.

Matthew Todd touches upon this in his book Straight Jacket, explaining that since society doesn’t really accept us, we don’t accept ourselves. This can manifest into unhealthy eating patterns and fixations on our appearance. Research from nationaleatingdisorders.org shows that 42% of reported males with eating disorders identify as gay, an alarming statistic considering the amount of people with disorders that are never reported or seek professional help.

These overly glorified body types with six-packs and obnoxious muscles are tied to the systemic heteronormative ideals imposed on queer men (I’m using queer as an umbrella term to encompass all LGBT+ men). I personally believe this view originates from the outdated idea that if we aren’t feminine, if we’re straight-passing and adhere to the same ridiculously toxic ideals of masculinity that straight men do, then we’ll be safe. Our masculinity won’t be questioned, it’ll be a physical display that even if someone does realise we are gay we are no less of a man.

Continuing on from Todd’s premise, we have doubly the pressure to be accepted by ourselves and by a heteronormative society that pokes fun at men who show any kind of emotion that isn’t anger (queue the disgusting Daily Mail article, written by Tammy Hughes, titled Sniff sniff! Why are so many grown men blubbing like babies on Celebrity Jungle?) In other words, bodybuilding and other kinds of grooming can be a symbol many queer men use to prove their worth and reclaim the masculinity that is dismissed upon coming out of the closet.

But we shouldn’t have to prove anything to anyone, especially obsolete gendered tropes and especially not to each other. All bodies are beautiful. Masculinity is just as attractive as femininity. In fact I’d take the sensitive guy over the repressed, self-hating jock, any day. The whole masc4masc thing needs to stop hiding behind the ‘it’s just my preference’ argument and face the reality that feminine guys making you uncomfortable warrants some self-reflection. Society tells you to value hegemonic masculinity, it’s not a preference if it’s been instilled since birth. And the same goes for whiteness and cisness.

Racism and transphobia within the LGBT+ communities deserve their own respective columns (neé, books), but they boil down to the same issue of beauty standards – we’ve been indoctrinated to believe whiteness and cisnormativity are the end-all be-all of desirability, and their counterparts are seen as less than. Obviously that’s nonsense, but it seems as if you’re not a skinny, white, cisgender manly man you don’t get the same level of recognition or respect as someone who is.

The irony of being part of a marginalised group that marginalises certain members of their community has been an ongoing issue within the LGBT+ communities that often gets swept under the metaphorical rainbow rug. I urge everyone to check out Grindr’s new Kindr campaign, where they address really important issues like sexual racism, body shaming, transphobia, HIV stigma and femme shaming on the app. They’ve changed their community guidelines and are actively starting conversations about these topics that need to be talked about and recognised.

Growing up, my gay role models were far and few between. I looked up to the drag queens on RuPaul’s Drag Race, Troye Sivan on YouTube, TV shows like Faking It and Glee, singers like Olly Alexander from Years & Years. There’s so much more diversity for the gay youth of today to look up to, as more and more role models come out and step up. It baffles me that this rigid thought of ‘traditionally’ attractive queer men somehow still exists.

Lee Henriques
Lee Henriques

If the person reading this isn’t white, cis, straight-acting or ripped, I just want you to know that you’re valid. Our communities can often discriminate against people who don’t fit the norm of all these inter-labels we love to place on each other. So instead, let’s celebrate what makes us different, what makes us more interesting than the carbon copy #Instagays. What makes you so much more than your appearance? We often tie our self-worth to our appearance when there’s so much more substance to us than our physicality.

Jameela Jamil created an Instagram-based movement (@i_weigh) for women to look beyond their weight and focus instead on what makes them uniquely them and measure their lives outside of weighing scales. I think we should do the same and love our physicality (in spite of all the possible ‘flaws’ we may have) but not fixate our entire worth on it. I’ll leave you with this: who are you outside of who you appear to be?

OPINION: How many people do you know who are HIV+?

Lee Henriques, an 18-year-old first year student studying English at Sussex University is Gscene’s newest and youngest columnist.

THEY’RE just like you and me, they walk and talk like you and me, eat and breathe like you and me, have families and friends and, yes, even partners, like you and me. To some people, the fact that someone has something called human immunodeficiency virus immediately marks them as a pariah.

Arguably, the stigma that used to plague people with HIV has somewhat lessened. There’s less of a taboo surrounding the topic. However, I believe there’s still a lot of misinformation about HIV – especially within the youth of the LGBT+ communities.

“I don’t want to risk being with someone who has it,” a friend of mine once said, and I agreed with them at the time. I disregarded PrEP, the fact that the virus cannot spread through the latex of a condom, and all the other precautions that can be taken to ensure safer sex with someone who is HIV+.

As a gay man who grew up in London, and came out to moderately accepting parents when I was 15, I’ve always been encompassed by a very safe, privileged bubble. Three years later, now living in Brighton, the same still applies.

I’ve never knowingly met anyone who has tested positive to HIV. I’ve never experienced the homophobic abuse that tragically still occurs so often and I’ve never received any kind of official sexual health education. Previously, I’ve written about the internet being my main source of information for gay  sex, expressing my frustration with education not tackling the plethora of new problems arising with modern-day culture.

HIV isn’t necessarily a new phenomenon, unlike the unrealistic body expectations and standards set through the glossy apps of Instagram and Snapchat, but it’s still not really being taught in schools. Almost every queer person I’ve ever met who has actually had some form of sex education has only been taught the most basic heteronormative definitions of sex and contraception. Penis, vagina, pregnancy. That’s it.

Gay history is multifaceted; more recent years have spurred some very celebratory occasions, such as the legalisation of same-sex marriage which marked a huge moment for the LGBT+ civil rights movement, but the darker side of gay history, such as the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s, tends to not be acknowledged by the younger gay generation as much as it should.

This could stem from a lack of education about LGBT+ history in general. It didn’t happen that long ago and so some people may feel it’s insensitive to talk about it when there are people alive, to this day, who lost their friends, their lovers, during it. The point is schools barely teach straight kids about sex, how are the gay youth supposed to know about HIV, safer sex, the history of the LGBT+ movement?

Being raised in Roman Catholic education, I had to use the internet and spiralled down the web many times using my own prerogative to learn what I wanted to learn. If I hadn’t taken that initiative, I would have had to learn through experience, a way more dangerous practice.

Some would say that used to be the case, before easy-access internet, when there weren’t really other options being a gay man in a society that practically condemned you. While that may be the case, hook-up culture (changed in recent years with the explosion of gay dating apps) seems to have made us less cautious.

Shouldn’t it be the opposite since we have the means and the information now, to be more careful? A no-strings-attached one-time Grindr fling could have lifelong consequences, which is why I can’t stress enough the importance of educating yourself and getting tested.

As already mentioned, the stigma around HIV has, thankfully, declined but that doesn’t mean that our attitudes towards unsafe sex and contracting STDs and STIs should be nonchalant.

HIV is more manageable than it’s ever been before but it’s important to recognise that your choices have consequences. By all means, have fun and explore your sexuality, but always be aware of the risks and know what you’re possibly getting into.

You can live your life normally as someone who is HIV+, of course, but it’s something you have to live with for the rest of your life.

Knowledge is power. Know how to practice safer sex and know how to get help if you need to.

X