menu

Madame Butterfly: Opera Holland Park: Review

madame butterfly

To be frank, the set looked tatty. Bare plywood covered with strips of black material, and an equally cobbled-together-looking raised stage platform with rough, canvas edging didn’t bode well. But Neil Irish’s design for Opera Holland Park’s latest open air outing, Puccini’s Madama Butterfly, had a surprise up its sleeve, for once the chorus had pulled down the drapes we were left with a wooden screen running the whole length of the stage with a beautiful striation painted across the middle. We were in Japan and we were on a fault line: a colonial one.

Butterfly is, in the great tradition of opera, a simple story of woe, thwarted hope, and death. Pinkerton (Joseph Wolverton), an American naval officer in late 19th Century Nagasaki, wants a wife. Marriage broker Goro (Robert Burt) suggests a 15 year old geisha called Cho-Cho San, the Butterfly of the title (Anne Sophie Duprels), whom he promptly pays for and weds. Butterfly is happy with her middle-aged American hubby and takes her vows seriously, even when Pinkerton forbids her from seeing her family, while he confesses to American consul Sharpless (David Stephenson) that he plans one day to take a ‘proper’ American wife and regards his marriage to Butterfly as one of convenience while he’s in Japan. Yes, he’s the archetypal girl-in-every-port sort of tar.

When Pinkerton sails off into the distance, promising Butterfly he’ll be back soon, she waits and pines. Cut to two years later in Act II and a child has appeared. Butterfly still waits, brushing off suggestions from Sharpless that Pinkerton has done the dirty on her, and he can’t quite bring himself to tell her that Pinkerton now has that ‘proper’ American wife.

But wait! There’s a ship in the harbour! And it’s Pinkerton’s ship! He’s back! But unfortunately for Butterfly, with his brand spanking new American wife. The cad.

Director Paul Higgins has pared down the set and props (a flag and a chair) for this sparse production. The costumes are authentic, and I particularly loved Goro’s frock coat and skirts which I’d wear at the drop of a hat. Butterfly is in a startlingly white obi for the first half, symbolically changing to western gear after her marriage, but Pinkerton’s naval garb looked shabby to my eyes, as did the mishmash of get-ups that the chorus donned, including some truly horrible wigs.

Namiko Gahier-Ogawa has coached the cast in traditional Japanese movements, used mostly by Duprels in the first act, but the effect is static, all stiff-handed chops and mystical offstage looks. It’s a useful, if rather obvious, pointer in the latter half, when she has adopted Pinkerton’s western lifestyle to tell when she’s really stressed as she goes all ‘choppy’ again. It comes over as slightly patronising to the audience, as if we couldn’t guess her emotions from her voice and words alone.

Duprels’ voice is wonderfully rich, although I’m no fan of her acting. She acts, stops acting, thinks about singing, sings, stops singing, thinks about acting, ad infinitum. It’s bitty, with no flow, although her stillness in the crucial ‘vigil’ scene is admirable.

A warm, buttery light falls over the stage for most of the performance, which compensates a little for the bareness of the set and warms the production up, as does Pinkerton’s stout, fatherly figure and rounded voice, but the overall effect is still a little cold, as is the chemistry between the spouses.

Despite its faults Madama Butterfly at Holland Park is still a good catch. Soaring music that everyone will recognise plus a wonderful posh London park setting is a combination that can’t really be beaten. And you know you’re in Poshland when the only sounds you can hear are opera and peacocks. Beats London Road Poundland any day!

What: Madama Butterfly

Where: Holland Park, London

When: July 2 & 4, 7.30pm

Tickets: £12 – £67.50

For more information, CLICK HERE:    

Actress cuts tape at Sussex Beacon fundraiser

Sussex Beacon

The Sussex Beacon’s annual Open Gardens fundraising event took place over the weekend,  June 29-30,

Doc Martin actress, Julie Graham cut the tape on Saturday morning to open The Sussex Beacon’s Garden to the public.

In attendance were Baroness Gould, Sussex Beacon Patron, Dave Lynn and the Deputy Mayor of Brighton & Hove, Cllr Bill Randall and his wife along with supporters of the Beacon including representatives from The Gay Men’s Chorus.

Over 70 gardens and community spaces all over the city were open to the public this year and all money raised from ticket sales goes to the Beacon’s fundraising.

For more information about the Sussex Beacon, CLICK HERE:

Actress Julie Graham cuts the ribbon to open the Sussex Beacon garden
Actress Julie Graham cuts the ribbon to open the Sussex Beacon garden

GMFA Show Their Cock at Pride

GMFA Cock Video

To celebrate this year’s Pride, GMFA, the gay men’s health charity, launched a new video, featuring a great big cock. But, unlike some of GMFA’s previous work, which has been noted for explicit language and imagery, this cock was family friendly enough to make it all the way to the main stage at Trafalgar Square.

The video’s star is a cockerel who pecks at information about HIV prevalence in the UK. The cock was also seen on t-shirts worn by GMFA’s army of volunteers on the Pride march on Saturday.

Matthew Hodson, GMFA’s Chief Executive, said:

“The video is fun but we’re making a serious point too. We’ve been doing some work with student and youth groups and we kept on hearing young gay men say that they felt that HIV wasn’t a problem anymore or that it didn’t affect them. The truth is that there are more gay men living with HIV in the UK now than ever before and a third of new diagnoses are amongst men in their teens and twenties. “

 “Treatments continue to improve, but, for most people, receiving an HIV positive diagnosis is still a huge and traumatic experience. The basic messages, of getting tested, protecting your own health and the health of your partners and of keeping yourself up to date with information about HIV, are as relevant today as they have ever been.”

The view the video, CLICK HERE: : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o924615EDC8

 

‘LET IT BE’: The Savoy Theatre: Review

Let It Be

“Is it like Jersey Boys?” I asked the usherette. “Does it have a story?”

“Not really,” was the dispiriting reply. “It’s just the greatest hits and a bit of gab between songs.”

And so it was. No gritty ‘how the band got together’ tale in this tourist-trap of a Beatles show now playing in the incongruous Art Deco surrounds of the Savoy Theatre. No torrid tales of love between John and Cynthia, or band members clashing over artistic differences. Instead, there’s this strange concert, running the gamut of emotions from Ringo to Ringo. So none at all really. And that’s my main quibble. I’ve seen a couple of shows before where bootleg Beatles (it may actually have been THE Bootleg Beatles, I just can’t remember) have run through either the greatest hits or a specific album. No chat, no story, just music, and I’ve been won over by their charm and enthusiasm, but not so with this cavernous, heartless show. It did nearly get there a couple of times, but pulled back from the emotional brink just too quickly.

It begins with the programme, a huge, hernia-inducing, glossy souvenir thing with very little substance, that won’t fit in anyone’s bag on their way home. On the cover is an all-encompassing Union Jack, just so the tourists have no doubt where they are: BeatleLand, or more specifically, Swinging Britain in the 60s. No, not now. Now is drab and dull and grey, but the 60s….well, that was were it was at….man.

Entering the Savoy, you’re confronted by giant set-ups of old wirelesses and Rediffusion TVs in place of a curtain. Projected onto the TVs are 1960s clips, some of which are pretty fun. There’s Alf Garnett flogging Findus Fish Fingers, and a wedding where everyone lights up a Capstan after they say ‘I do’. The point made that this was a different era with different sensibilities, my hopes rose that the show might be a little tongue in cheek, a little subversive in its outlook, but this didn’t last long: five minutes later we were in the smoky Cavern, all brickwork arches and dim lighting. Yes, they do look passably like the Moptops, and yes, they do sound like them too. Two boxes ticked. Ringo drummed through the early numbers with a fag hanging from his mouth. Yes, a different era indeed.

My earplugs came out at this point. It’s not that I dislike Beatles tunes – I can sing along to most – but I am getting on a bit and the speakers were groaning under the volume. Strangely, the vocals came through clear as a bell, but the instruments made a right old not-nice racket. Even my teenage son commented on the din.

Middle aged women began to clap out of time as only middle aged women can. The Brazilian quartet seated below us began to rave, mistaking a theatre show for a gig. They continued in this vein throughout, talking as loudly as they could, downing pint after pint, struggling out of their row to the loo, and that most unforgivable sin of all – standing up and dancing. The bastards. They were duly told off by the usherettes but continued on their merry little Brazilian way, despite the British tuts engulfing them.

The Beatles were a pretty static band on stage with no great dancers, no guitar-smashing antics, just standing and singing, and so it’s difficult to criticize this show for not being a roller-coaster of frenetic movement. Realising this, director and musical supervisor John Maher has tried to bring the whole thing to life with a series of animations projected onto the backdrop, and also visible on large monitors to the sides of the stage. Unfortunately they were the worst animations I’d seen in a long time, using Beatles’ imagery but not keeping strictly enough to period fonts and photos, and they ended up being as uninteresting as seeing fake Paul, John, George and Ringos on stage.

Chronologically true, we go from the Cavern to the conquest of America to Shea Stadium to the Sergeant Pepper era to 70s psychedelia to Vietnam protests to…well, you get the picture. It’s basically a run-through, with some of the most minimal staging I’ve ever seen in the West End (I’m looking at you, A Chorus Line). The backgrounds change, the hair and moustaches gets longer, the clothes get more colourful, but that’s it. The projections on the large TVs are fuzzy and unreadable while the ones at the sides of the stage, giving us close-ups of singing faces, are 2 seconds out of synch. It all looks terribly cheap.

The modern voiceover which makes very little attempt to even pretend to be ‘of the age’ adds to this shoddiness, as do the stagehands who whip on between songs. Neutral black clothes just don’t cut the mustard in a piece like this.

And this is the fundamental problem with this show. It’s neither one thing nor another. It races through periods but doesn’t keep up the pretence with the peripherals, so you can’t become absorbed in any of the music without some jarring experience waking you from your reverie (and I include a tourist audience in the list of ‘jarring experiences’). And did George sing quite so many lead vocals? And did John clone himself for Lucy in the Sky as I’m pretty sure there were two on stage at the same time (or perhaps it was the hallucinogenic effects of the song)? Odd, very odd.

I did become a little more engaged once they all sat on stools and ran through Blackbird, which was ironic in one way as the staging became even more static, but the intimacy of the songs began to work their magic as the crap gimmicks disappeared for a little while.

It didn’t last. I found myself looking at the audience rather than the stage, trying to get a grip on who this show appealed to. Tourists, mostly, as you’d imagine, but there was quite a swathe of grey as couples in their 60’s relived their youth. Families with teenage children also made up quite a proportion. Half were clapping, singing, swaying their arms: half were sitting with a look of utter blankness as if totally bemused by the whole spectacle. When ‘John’ enjoined the crowd to get on their feet, half did so with gusto while the other half sighed at the prospect of spending the next five minutes staring at someone else’s swaying bum.

By the time the encore was in full swing with, of course, Let It Be, and that obligatory dirge Hey Jude, the audience was on its feet and swaying unrhymically. Arthritic arms were in the air, cameraphones were blinking, confetti was pouring from the Savoy ceiling, and I gently took my earplugs out and dreampt longingly of my bed. I mean, listening to The Beatles back catalogue is never a wholly unpleasant experience by its very nature, but I did expect more of a show than I got with Let It Be. Given the choice of Jersey Boys and this lazy excuse for a show, I know which one I’d plump for every time.

Event:  Let It Be

Where: The Savoy Theatre, The Strand, London

When: booking till next year

Cost:  Tickets: £15-£90

For more information, CLICK HERE:    www.letitbelondon.com

Let it be has now transfered to the Garrick Theatre.

For more information, click here:

 

 

 

 

X